Amazon Prime FREE Trial options
https://www.amazon.com/amazonprime?tag=googhydr-20&hvadid=381655816555&hvpos=&hvexid=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=4012463343274674196&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9009703&hvtargid=kwd-828881280391&ref=pd_sl_34qfrygf2i_b#PricingModuleAnchor
How to pledge your FREE Twitch sub from Amazon Prime to the Stronghold!
https://www.amazongames.com/en-gb/support/prime-gaming/articles/subscribe-to-a-channel-using-prime-gaming
You can find me LIVE on Twitch everyday! Stop by to hangout, or ask a question. https://www.twitch.tv/planeswalkersstronhold
You owe yourself the experience of Value of our many Patreon options https://www.patreon.com/user?u=96404140
I have over 350 budget friendly decks in my Aetherhub archive https://aetherhub.com/User/PlaneswalkersStronghold
Many Magic: The Gathering Arena players have voiced several concerns regarding the Alchemy format and its unique cards. These perceived issues touch upon various aspects of the game, from balance and design philosophy to economic implications and format integration. Here’s a breakdown of the key issues:
1. Balance Concerns:
Power Level of Alchemy Cards: Some players feel that Alchemy cards, particularly those with digital-only mechanics, tend to be pushed in terms of power level. This can lead to imbalances within the Alchemy format itself and also when these cards are integrated into other formats like Historic.
Frequent Rebalancing: While the ability to rebalance cards is a core feature of Alchemy, some players find the frequency and impact of these changes disruptive. Investing wildcards in cards that might be nerfed later without compensation leads to frustration and a feeling of lost value.
Impact on Historic: A significant point of contention is the inclusion of Alchemy cards, including rebalanced versions of Standard cards, in the Historic format. Players who enjoy Historic for its broader card pool and resemblance to paper Magic often dislike facing cards with altered functionalities or digital-only mechanics. Some feel it dilutes the spirit of the format.
2. Design Philosophy and “Feel” of Magic:
Digital-Only Mechanics: Mechanics like “Conjure,” “Seek,” and “Perpetual” are exclusive to the digital realm. While some appreciate the novelty, others feel these mechanics deviate too far from traditional Magic gameplay and create a “Hearthstone-y” experience that doesn’t align with their preferred style of play.
Spellbooks: Cards that “draft” or select cards from a pre-determined “spellbook” are seen by some as adding unnecessary randomness and reducing the strategic depth of deckbuilding and gameplay.
Complexity: Some Alchemy cards are criticized for having overly complex text and effects, making them harder to understand and evaluate at a glance.
“Paper-Viable” Alchemy Cards: There’s a sentiment that some Alchemy cards could have been printed in paper Magic sets. Their exclusivity to Arena feels like an unnecessary division and potentially takes design space away from paper products.
3. Economic Issues:
Cost of Acquisition: Alchemy sets introduce a significant number of new rare and mythic cards, increasing the wildcard investment needed to stay competitive in Arena, especially for players who engage with multiple formats.
Lack of Wildcard Reimbursement: When Alchemy cards are rebalanced (especially nerfed), players do not receive wildcard refunds, leading to a feeling of wasted resources.
Perceived “Money Grab”: Some players view Alchemy as a way for Wizards of the Coast to encourage more spending on digital cards that players don’t truly “own.”
4. Format Identity and Integration:
Lack of a Clear Mission Statement: Some players are unclear on the intended purpose of Alchemy. Is it meant to be a more balanced Standard alternative, a digital-only playground, or something else entirely? This lack of clarity can contribute to player hesitation and confusion.
Forced Integration: The inclusion of Alchemy cards in Historic and Historic Brawl is seen by some as forcing players who dislike the format to engage with it against their will. Many would prefer a clear separation with a Historic format that excludes Alchemy cards.
In summary, the perceived issues with Alchemy cards in Magic: The Gathering Arena revolve around concerns about balance, the departure from traditional Magic design, the economic burden on players, and the integration of Alchemy into established formats like Historic. While some players appreciate the dynamic nature and new mechanics of Alchemy, a significant portion of the player base expresses a desire for clearer separation and a greater focus on the aspects of Magic they traditionally enjoy.
コメント